In the early twentieth century, the United States was still stitching itself together. Vast rural distances separated families, roads were unreliable, and train tickets were a luxury many could not afford. Then, in 1913, a quiet bureaucratic reform changed daily life in ways no one fully anticipated.
The United States Postal Service introduced Parcel Post—a revolutionary system designed to make long-distance shipping affordable for ordinary Americans, especially those living far from cities. For the first time, people could send large items through the mail at reasonable rates. Farmers shipped produce. Families mailed clothing, tools, and household goods. The postal carrier became not just a letter deliverer, but a trusted logistical lifeline.
What lawmakers didn’t realize was that they had left behind a peculiar omission.
The rules specified weight limits. They detailed packaging requirements. They outlined insurance policies.
They never explicitly said you couldn’t mail a person.
And for a very brief, very strange moment in American history, a handful of families noticed.
A System Built on Trust
To understand how something as unthinkable as mailing children could even happen, it helps to understand the role of the postal service at the time.
In the early 1900s, the United States Postal Service was one of the most trusted institutions in the country. Mail carriers didn’t just deliver letters. They transported money orders, legal documents, livestock, bees, and even live chickens. In rural communities, the carrier was often a neighbor, someone who knew every family on their route.
This trust mattered.
When Parcel Post was introduced in January 1913, it was framed as a democratic reform—one that would shrink distances and bring rural America closer to the rest of the country. Parcels were limited by weight, initially capped at 11 pounds, then gradually raised. Rates were low. Insurance was available. Oversight existed, but enforcement relied heavily on local discretion.
Nowhere in the regulations did it say, plainly and unequivocally, “Human beings may not be mailed.”
That omission would lead to one of the strangest footnotes in American bureaucratic history.
The Economic Reality Behind the Decision
This was not an era of casual travel.
Train tickets, especially for long distances, were expensive relative to income. For rural families scraping by on farming or manual labor, sending a child to visit relatives could cost several days’ wages. Meanwhile, postage for a lightweight parcel was measured in cents.
Parents did the math.
If a child weighed less than the maximum allowance, postage could be dramatically cheaper than a ticket. The child wouldn’t be “shipped” in a crate, of course. These were escorted journeys, overseen by familiar postal workers. But on paper, the transaction looked like mailing a parcel.
The families involved were not reckless. They were pragmatic, operating within the letter of the law as it existed at the time.
Baby James Beagle and a 15-Cent Fare
One of the earliest documented cases involved a baby named James Beagle.
In 1913, shortly after Parcel Post went into effect, James was mailed to his grandmother’s home. The cost? 15 cents in postage. His parents even insured him for $50, the same way one might insure a valuable item.
There was no crate. No box. James traveled under the supervision of a mail carrier, much like a modern-day chaperoned journey. To the family, this was simply a safe, affordable way to reunite a child with relatives.
To postal officials, once they noticed, it was something else entirely.
May Pierstorff’s 73-Mile Mail Ride
The most famous case came a year later.
In 1914, four-year-old May Pierstorff was mailed from Grangeville, Idaho, to her grandparents’ home in Lewiston—a journey of 73 miles. Stamps were pinned to her coat. She rode in a mail car, accompanied by a postal clerk who knew the family.
The cost was 53 cents.
Again, this was not a case of neglect or danger as it would be understood today. May was supervised the entire time. The postal worker acted as an escort. The journey was treated as an extension of the trust-based system rural families relied on daily.
But symbolically, the idea was unsettling.
A child, traveling as mail.
Why It Was Technically Legal
The legality hinged on silence.
Parcel Post regulations were designed to govern objects, not people. But they didn’t explicitly exclude people, either. The system was built around weight, not identity. If something met the weight limit and wasn’t prohibited livestock or hazardous material, it could be mailed.
Children—small, light, and accompanied—slipped through the gap.
Postal officials later emphasized that the spirit of the law never intended this use. But bureaucracies operate on text, not intention. Until rules were clarified, the loophole existed.
A Short Window That Closed Quickly
Once stories began circulating, postal authorities acted fast.
By 1915, the Post Office formally clarified regulations, stating that human beings were not mailable matter. The loophole closed almost as soon as it had been noticed. No sweeping scandal followed. No prosecutions were needed. The system corrected itself quietly.
The number of cases was small—fewer than a dozen are reliably documented. But their existence tells us something important about the era.
What This Moment Reveals About Early 20th-Century America
This strange episode wasn’t born from absurdity. It emerged from economic necessity, institutional trust, and the limits of early regulation.
It shows:
-
How trusted public systems were woven into daily life
-
How families navigated hardship with creativity rather than recklessness
-
How bureaucracy can unintentionally allow the unthinkable
It also reflects a time when communities were smaller, relationships were personal, and systems operated with flexibility that would be impossible today.
A postal carrier wasn’t an anonymous employee. He was someone you knew.
Why It Feels So Shocking Now
Modern readers react with disbelief, even horror, to the idea of mailing a child. But that reaction is shaped by today’s context: heightened safety standards, impersonal institutions, and a strict separation between people and systems.
In 1913, those boundaries were blurrier.
The same system that carried money and animals could, for a brief moment, carry something even more precious—because the people using it trusted those handling the journey.
Not Neglect, But a Mirror of Its Time
It’s easy to judge the past by modern standards. But doing so misses the point.
These parents weren’t careless. They were navigating a world with limited options. The postal service was one of the safest, most reliable networks available to them. The decision wasn’t about convenience—it was about access.
And once officials recognized the implications, the system changed.
A Footnote That Still Resonates
Today, this episode survives as a curiosity, often shared as a quirky historical anecdote. But beneath the strangeness is a deeper lesson about how systems evolve—and how unintended consequences emerge when policy meets real life.
It reminds us that:
-
Laws must anticipate human behavior, not just ideal use
-
Trust can enable both efficiency and vulnerability
-
Even well-intentioned reforms can produce unexpected outcomes
And perhaps most of all, it reminds us that history is not just a record of grand events. Sometimes, it’s shaped by a child with stamps on her coat, riding a mail car through rural Idaho—technically legal, briefly possible, and never repeated.
For a fleeting moment, American bureaucracy left the door open. Families walked through it. And then it quietly closed again, leaving behind one of the strangest true stories the postal system ever carried.