Justice Denied or Justice Served? A Nation Divided by Ideology, Identity, and Fear
On August 23, 1927, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti—two Italian immigrants and self-proclaimed anarchists—were executed by electric chair in Charlestown State Prison, Massachusetts. Their deaths were the climax of one of the most controversial and politically charged trials in American history.
To some, Sacco and Vanzetti were cold-blooded killers who paid the price for a brutal crime. To others, they were scapegoats, victims of xenophobia, classism, and America’s post-World War I hysteria. Their case became an international cause célèbre, drawing protests from intellectuals, artists, and working-class movements across the globe.
Nearly a century later, the Sacco and Vanzetti case remains a haunting example of how justice can be tangled with prejudice, fear, and ideology—and how a courtroom can become a battleground for the soul of a nation.
The Crime: South Braintree Robbery and Murder
On April 15, 1920, in South Braintree, Massachusetts, two men—Frederick Parmenter, a paymaster, and Alessandro Berardelli, his guard—were ambushed and gunned down in broad daylight while carrying a factory payroll of $15,776.51. The killers escaped in a waiting getaway car, setting off one of the most intense manhunts in the state’s history.
Weeks later, Sacco and Vanzetti were arrested in Brockton, Massachusetts. They were armed, carrying anarchist literature, and lied to police about their activities. That, coupled with their political beliefs and immigrant status, made them instant suspects in the eyes of law enforcement.
Who Were Sacco and Vanzetti?
Nicola Sacco
A 29-year-old shoemaker from Torremaggiore, Italy, Sacco was hardworking and politically active. He lived in Massachusetts with his wife and child, participating in labor movements and anti-capitalist demonstrations.
Bartolomeo Vanzetti
An older, fish peddler and intellectual from Villafalletto, Italy, Vanzetti was known for his passionate anarchist rhetoric and writings. He was deeply involved in immigrant rights and social justice causes.
Both men were followers of Luigi Galleani, an Italian anarchist who advocated violent revolution. While they had no direct criminal records, they were open about their hatred for capitalism and government, making them prime targets in a tense post-war America.
America in 1920: A Nation on Edge
The arrest of Sacco and Vanzetti occurred during a period of deep national anxiety:
-
The Red Scare of 1919–1920 had gripped the country following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, leading to a crackdown on communists, anarchists, and labor activists.
-
The Palmer Raids, orchestrated by Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer, had resulted in mass arrests and deportations of immigrants suspected of radicalism.
-
Anti-immigrant sentiment was at a peak, especially against Italians, Jews, and Eastern Europeans, who were often blamed for labor unrest and violence.
In this climate, two armed Italian anarchists seemed guilty from the start.
The Trial: Evidence, Prejudice, and Doubt
The trial began in 1921 in Dedham, Massachusetts, presided over by Judge Webster Thayer, a known hardliner who had previously voiced anti-anarchist sentiments. The prosecution focused on circumstantial evidence:
-
Ballistics tests were inconclusive but suggested Sacco’s gun might have fired one of the fatal bullets.
-
Both men had lied to police, which the prosecution used to imply guilt.
-
Eyewitness testimony was unreliable and often contradictory, with language barriers and misidentification playing significant roles.
The defense, led by Fred Moore, argued that the trial was not about evidence, but about the men’s political beliefs and ethnic background. They presented dozens of alibi witnesses for both men and highlighted the lack of concrete proof. But Judge Thayer frequently undercut their efforts with bias-laden rulings and commentary.
Despite the weaknesses in the case, the jury returned a guilty verdict on July 14, 1921.
A Worldwide Outcry
The verdict sparked an international firestorm:
-
Intellectuals like Albert Einstein, H.G. Wells, and George Bernard Shaw protested the verdict.
-
Writers including Upton Sinclair and John Dos Passos joined rallies and penned searing critiques.
-
Labor unions, immigrant groups, and anarchist circles staged demonstrations from New York to Buenos Aires to Paris.
Mass protests erupted in cities across Europe and the Americas. In the U.S., bombings and riots were linked to anarchist groups demanding their release. The execution was delayed multiple times as appeals, motions, and public pressure mounted.
Even as new evidence emerged—including confessions from other suspects and serious questions about the handling of the firearms—the courts refused to overturn the verdict.
Final Words and Execution: August 23, 1927
After seven years of appeals and petitions, Sacco and Vanzetti were executed in the electric chair at Charlestown State Prison in the early hours of August 23, 1927.
Their final statements were stoic and defiant:
-
Sacco: “I am innocent of all crime… I am an innocent man.”
-
Vanzetti: “I wish to forgive some people for what they are now doing to me… I am suffering because I am a radical.”
Outside the prison, thousands of protestors gathered. Some wept, others burned American flags. Around the world, their deaths were mourned as a symbol of injustice.
Aftermath and Legacy
The Sacco and Vanzetti case had long-lasting ramifications:
-
In 1977, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis issued a proclamation stating that Sacco and Vanzetti had been unfairly tried and convicted, saying “any disgrace should be forever removed from their names.”
-
The case inspired countless works of art, literature, and film, including the 1971 movie Sacco e Vanzetti, and the folk song Here’s to You by Joan Baez and Ennio Morricone.
-
It led to greater scrutiny of capital punishment, judicial impartiality, and civil liberties.
While it remains debated whether Sacco or Vanzetti (or both) were actually involved in the robbery, the consensus among historians leans toward a grave miscarriage of justice, driven more by ideology and fear than proof.
Conclusion: A Trial Bigger Than the Crime
The execution of Sacco and Vanzetti was more than a legal ruling—it was a national reckoning, exposing the deep fractures in American democracy: between justice and prejudice, between fear and fairness, between truth and power.
Whether martyrs or murderers, Sacco and Vanzetti have come to symbolize how quickly a justice system can become a mirror of society’s darkest impulses, and how difficult it is to separate law from politics when the stakes are human lives.
Their case still asks an unsettling question:
What happens when justice is decided not in the courtroom, but in the court of public fear?